Compendium I – Settlement Analysis: The Good & Manners Section.VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=VIETNAMESE BUDDIST NUN=THE WOMEN OF THE SAKYA CLAN CHAN TANH.
Episode I
Settlement Analysis
How To Behave
(Is) conduct is conduct Law with presence (and) conduct Law with presence is conduct? Is behavior according to the majority (and) following the majority is behavior? The way to behave is to act the Law by remembering (and) to act the Law by remembering is the way to behave? Behavior is to behave Law when not crazy (and) act Law when not crazy is behavior? Conduct as adjudicated guilt (and) admitted guilt judgment as conduct? The way to behave is according to his sin (and) according to his sin is the way to behave? Behavior is how to use grass cover (and) how to use grass cover is how to behave?
The conduct may be to act the Law with presence, it may not be the act of the Law with presence. Acting the Law with Presence is both a way of behaving and acting with the Law with Presence.
The behavior may be according to the majority, may not be according to the majority. Following the majority is both a way of behaving and following the majority.
The way to behave may be to act the Law by remembering, it may not be to act the Law by remembering. Acting the Law by remembering is both a way of behaving and acting of the Law by remembering.
The way to behave may be to behave the Law when not crazy, it may not be to behave the Law when not crazy. Acting the Law when not crazy is both the way to behave and the Law when not to be crazy.
The conduct may be adjudication of admitted guilt, may not be adjudication of admitted guilt. Judgment according to admitted guilt is both conduct and judgment according to admitted guilt.
The behavior may be according to his sin, may not be according to his sin. According to his sin is both his behavior and his sin.
The behavior may be grass cover, may not be grass cover. The use of grass cover is both a behavior and a way to use grass cover.
The end of the Behavior section is the twelfth .
*****
The Good Part
Is Acting the Law with Presence good, bad, (or) indeterminate? Is following the majority good, bad, (or) indeterminate? Is acting the Law with remembrance good, bad, (or) indeterminate? Is it good, bad, (or) indeterminate to behave in the Law when not crazy? Judgment by sin has been admitted as good, bad, (or) indeterminate? According to his sin is good, is not good, (or) is indefinite? Is cover grass good, bad, (or) unspecified?
Acting the Law with presence may be good, it may be indeterminate, not acting on the Law with presence is not good.
Following the majority may be good, it may not be good, it may be indeterminate.
Acting the Law with remembrance may be good, it may not be good, it may be indeterminate.
Acting the Law when not crazy can be good, it can be bad, it can be indeterminate.
Adjudicated guilt may be good, it may not be good, it may be indeterminate.
According to his sin may be good, may not be good, may be indeterminate.
The use of cover grass may be good, it may not be good, it may be indeterminate.
Is the contention related to the controversy good, bad, (or) indeterminate? Is a reprimand dispute good, bad, (or) indeterminate? Is litigation regarding guilt good, bad, (or) indeterminate? Is the quest-related contention good, bad, (or) indeterminate?
Controversy may be good, it may not be good, it may be indeterminate.
Disputes involving reprimands can be good, they can be bad, they can be indeterminate.
Litigation regarding guilt may be unkind, may be indeterminate, no litigation regarding guilt may be good.
Task-related litigation may be good, it may not be good, it may be indeterminate.
The end of the Good part is the thirteenth .END=NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).BUDDHIST DHARMA WHEEL GOLDEN MONASTERY=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THE WOMEN OF THE SAKYA CLAN CHAN TANH.AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.30/9/2021.
STORY I TI TIBETI TIBETA TIRENGAN LEGAL STORY PROJECT I – ACTION CHAPTER: ACTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES, TWENTY LEGAL ACTIONS DAY 6 - IMPORTANCE OF DISTRIBUTION I AND MINORITY CHAPTERS: The Practice of Reprimand The Twelve Practices of the Dharma This, bhikkhus, the practice of reprimanding is the practice of the Dharma, the conduct of the Law, and has been well resolved when there are three factors: Is done with the presence representation, done from interrogation, done with admission. Bhikkhus, the practice of reprimand has these three elements, which is in accordance with the Dharma, in accordance with the Law, and has been well resolved. Bhikkhus, the act of reprimand is the conduct of the Dharma, the conduct of the Law, and is well resolved when there are three other factors: It is done with the offense, is done with the offense. offenses that lead to repentance, committed with unrepentant sins. Bhikkhus, the practice of reprimand has these three elements, which is in accordance with...
Comments
Post a Comment